Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.kmf.uz.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4274
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Csernicsko Istvan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Csernicskó István | hu |
dc.contributor.author | Черничко Степан | uk |
dc.contributor.author | Petteri Laihonen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-30T09:58:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-30T09:58:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | In Multilingua: journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication. 2016. Volume 35., Issue 1. pp. 1-30. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-8507 (Print) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1613-3684 (Online) | - |
dc.identifier.other | DOI: 10.1515/multi-2014-0073 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kmf.uz.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4274 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract. From the early twentieth century to the present day, Transcarpathia has belonged to several states: the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy, Czechoslovakia, the Hungarian Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and finally to Ukraine. The status of what counts as a minority and a majority language has changed each time the state affiliation has been changed. Based on the long term research by Csernicskó, and on the one-month fieldwork carried out by Laihonen in 2012, our goal is to provide an autonomous critical account and discourse analysis of the linguistic situation in Transcarpathia. We draw examples especially from the linguistic landscape, which documents the hybrid practices difficult to catch with other means. Different nation states have aimed to evaluate certain languages over others. However, Transcarpathia has been too far away from different national centers and it has therefore remained a periphery. In the everyday life of Transcarpathians, ironies around language repertoires, standardization and heteroglossia come into the fore, especially in the current context. Such unexpected linguistic practices or “pre-nationalist” and “non-purist” ideologies offer a change to see how certain categories, such as language, have remained in their hybrid forms and are still clearly “in the making”. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | The research was supported by the Academy of Finland grant 137718 for Laihonen. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter Mouton | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication;Volume 35., Issue 1. | - |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Transcarpathia | en |
dc.subject | language policy | en |
dc.subject | linguistic landscape | en |
dc.subject | Hungarian language | en |
dc.subject | Rusyn language | en |
dc.subject | Ukrainian language | en |
dc.title | Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today | en |
dc.type | dc.type.researchStudy | en |
Appears in Collections: | Csernicskó István |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
I_Csernicsko_P_Laihonen_Hybrid_pract_meet_nation_state_language_polic_2016.pdf | In Multilingua: journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication. 2016.Volume 35., Issue 1. pp. 1-30. | 2.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License