Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.kmf.uz.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4899
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalogh Péterhu
dc.contributor.authorKovály Katalinhu
dc.contributor.authorКоваль Катеринаuk
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-12T12:27:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-12T12:27:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-31-
dc.identifier.citationIn Nationalities Papers. 2024. pp. 1-24.en
dc.identifier.issn0090-5992 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1465-3923 (Online)-
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1017/nps.2024.51-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.kmf.uz.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4899-
dc.descriptionEditorial board: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/information/about-this-journal/editorial-boarden
dc.descriptionContent: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/firstview?pageNum=2&searchWithinIds=C480B8F2C40A05CE0C10D2037E96FA58&productType=JOURNAL_ARTICLE&sort=canonical.date%3Adesc%2CtitleSort%3Aasc&pageSize=20&template=cambridge-core%2Fjournal%2Farticle-listings%2Flistings-wrapper&displayNasaAds=false&hideArticleJournalMetaData=trueen
dc.descriptionhttps://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/handle/10831/113327en
dc.description.abstractAbstract. This article analyzes the key factors behind the securitization of Ukraine’s small ethnic Hungarian minority in recent years and how they affect local interethnic as well as interstate relations. It draws on elite interviews conducted in the Ukrainian-Hungarian borderland, and other sources including speech acts. Four underlying factors were identified. The first two are Hungary’s kin-state aid and dual citizenship law, which have empowered Ukraine’s ethnic Hungarians, with the community appearing larger and potentially more threatening in the eyes of the majority population than its mere size justifies. The other two factors are Ukraine’s language policy and Transcarpathia’s future being subject of conspiracy theories in light of Russia’s invasion of eastern Ukraine, which have negatively affected interethnic ties, although somewhat less in the borderland than between Hungary and Ukraine at large. In Transcarpathia, our different informants had diverging perceptions of who is stirring tensions but agreed that actors from outside their region were to blame. Overall, what has emerged is a clash of Hungary’s kin-state politics and Ukraine’s nation-statebuilding efforts. The article ends with more general implications for kin- and host-state relations in times of conflict.en
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch for this contribution was part of the Cluster of Excellence “Contestations of the Liberal Script” (EXC 2055, Project-ID: 390715649), funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy. In addition, during the time of the research Péter Balogh participated in a project supported from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary (NKFI K 134903 Geopolitical Processes and Imaginaries in Central Europe: States, Borders, Integration and Regional Development).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectminority securitizationen
dc.subjectkin-state politicsen
dc.subjectminority salienceen
dc.subjectgroup homogeneityen
dc.subjectTranscarpathiaen
dc.titleSmall but Salient: The Securitization of Ukraine’s Ethnic Hungarian Minorityen
dc.typedc.type.researchStudyen
Appears in Collections:Kovály Katalin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Balogh_Kovaly_Small_but_Salient_The_Securitization_Ukraine_Ethnic_2024.pdfIn Nationalities Papers. 2024. pp. 1-24.2.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons